STOP PRESS:
COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT ANNOUNCES RESPONSE TO ALRC REPORT INTO FAMILY LAW AND RELEASES RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE JOINT SELECT INQUIRY INTO THE FAMILY LAW SYSTEM
Tips For First Appearances
COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT ANNOUNCES RESPONSE TO ALRC REPORT INTO FAMILY LAW AND RELEASES RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE JOINT SELECT INQUIRY INTO THE FAMILY LAW SYSTEM
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Acts (FCFCA Act) has now received Royal Assent and will commence the earlier of Proclamation or six months from the date of Royal Assent.
After extensive debate in the Senate, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2019 were passed with some minor amendments.
On Thursday I will be speaking at a FLPA lunchtime webinar about the world of online dispute resolution (ODR) that has seemingly been thrust upon us by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Now is the time for innovation – a time to repurpose our service to clients.
The last few weeks have caused significant disruption to the way we help our family law clients and this situation is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. But this does not have to mean that we cannot continue to assist our clients resolve their disputes efficiently, economically and with as little emotional distress as possible.
The Chief Justice of the Family Court has recently produced a statement that provides guidance to parents navigating compliance with existing parenting orders and following Government protocols, restrictions and complications due to the COVID-19 virus,
My mediation process has been redesigned to provide a more efficient booking process but primarily to expect greater involvement from me than what is considered the norm.
An application in the Federal Circuit Court to vary a spousal maintenance order made in 1999, where the parties had been divorced for 21 years, was successful.
Around twenty years ago, private mediation of family law disputes was a relatively new professional service. Today, mediation before litigation is mandatory in parenting disputes and is certainly considered best practice for all family law disputes. Since 2015, arbitration of family law financial disputes has become more widely understood and accepted. Indeed, practitioners have recently been challenged to inform the court as to whether the relevant matter is appropriate for arbitration. A common question I am now receiving, is “Can you then arbitrate this dispute after you have mediated ?”
Mediation data for this financial year here at ADR Chambers has been collected. Analysing that data has revealed some interesting statistics.
In his first media release as AG in the 46th Federal Parliament, Mr. Porter announced; “In the Attorney-General’s portfolio there are a number of major reforms on the Government’s agenda which I will be working to achieve early in the 46th Parliament,” the Attorney-General said. “The highest priority will be the structural reform of the family law courts to ensure families requiring the assistance of the courts to finalise their relationships are able to have their matters dealt with as quickly, efficiently and cheaply as possible." But how and when remain the biggest questions to be answered.
A quick review of some interesting Full Court decisions for the first quarter 2019. "Supervision" or "in the presence of" is there a difference ? When is hardship established in a leave to proceed application ? When accounting methodology does not meet FLA methodology and running Kennon arguments. When is legal privilege lost ? When is confidentiality to a settlement communication lost ?
Changes to the Family Law Act commenced on 11 March 2019 that will affect proceedings from 11 September 2019.
It is often raised as a point of discussion "What are the grounds for an objection to an award pursuant to reg 67Q of the Family Law Regulations." Last year I posted an article about this topic particularly the lack of prescription of the grounds for objecting to the registration of an award.
The ALRC released on 2 October 2018 it’s Discussion Paper making 124 far-reaching and significant proposals for change to the family law system. I look at 6 proposals that will be of interest to family law practitioners. Submissions are due by 13 November 2018 with the ALRC to report to the Attorney-General by 31 March 2018.
A colleague recently said to me that my competing in ultramarathons must be a good way of escaping the stress of conducting family law mediations. “No”, I said, “Ultramarathons help me become a better mediator.”
Early resolution of family disputes is my primary purpose as a barrister. You could say it’s my speciality. At the 8th National Family Law Conference Brisbane there was much discussion, debate and deliberation about the way forward for the family law system. Arbitration is part of that way forward. See below for my special fixed fee arbitration solution.
Speaking at 7:30 a.m. on a Thursday about Practice Direction 2 of 2017 might appear like a disaster waiting to happen particularly during a regional trial week and with a Federal Circuit Judge and State Magistrate in attendance along with several senior family lawyers and a selection of local family law stakeholders. Particularly when my usual crutch – the PowerPoint – was not available.
The last 12 months have seen a litany of changes proposed or introduced into the family law system none more significant than the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2018. Introduced into Federal Parliament on 23 August 2018, the Bill is currently before the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee for report back to the Senate by 28 September 2018 (delayed to 23 November 2018). The debate about the bill has been extensive and public with exchanges between the Commonwealth Attorney General, Judges and representative associations of solicitors, barristers and the Family Law Section. But what does the Bill actually contain? Here is my attempt to dissect the Bill.
Family law practitioners have experienced significant changes during 2018. With the introduction of PD 2 of 2017 in the Federal Circuit Court, the pilot project in the Brisbane Registry of the FCC and many more recent legislative amendments passed and proposed, never has the need for pragmatic, precise and professional advocacy been more important. No more so than during interim applications. Recently, in Matenson, Justice Murphy of the Full Court of the Family Court provided some helpful hints and recommendations in order to assist judges sitting in busy duty lists.
The Commonwealth Attorney General today released draft amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 regarding preventing direct cross-examination of a victim of domestic violence from the perpetrator of such abuse.
A successful separation is one in which the parents separate from each other but do not require the child to separate from one of the parents, either as a result of parental conflict or by one parent not being available to the child.
The Commonwealth Attorney General has today announced a significant financial boost to our struggling children's contact centres and the new FDR services being piloted across Australia including in Queensland.
Australians have lead the way in terms of utilizing mediation as a means of resolving family law disputes but have been slow to embrace the arbitration of those disputes.
Barely a week goes by now without receiving some enquiry about arbitration. The momentum toward this form of dispute resolution is now in full swing with the benefits this forum provides now being realised by both clients and lawyers.
The Commonwealth Attorney General has today announced a significant financial boost to our struggling children's contact centers and the new FDR services being piloted across Australia including in Queensland.
A successful separation is one in which the parents separate from each other but do not require the child to separate from one of the parents, either as a result of parental conflict or by one parent not being available to the child.
The Commonwealth Attorney General today released draft amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 regarding preventing direct cross-examination of a victim of domestic violence from the perpetrator of such abuse.
This interesting article on Mediate.com is recommended reading for those PDR practitioners, especially FDRPs.
Significant, overwhelming, bigger, contributions. Good grief.
Reviewing the following Full Court decisions reinforces my view that arbitrations are simply a more viable time and cost saving dispute resolution forum in financial matters.
As I approach delivering my first award at the end of this month, it is pleasing to hear the number of conversations (in the line up to the associate) about referral of disputes to arbitration.
We have heard some regional practitioners and judges complain about a lack of mediation resources contributing to longer delays for litigants or less satisfactory outcomes in regional areas. It's not that there isn't experienced local mediators – quite the contrary – but reduced availability due to court commitments or conflicts are increased in regional areas.
The last few weeks has seen me stepping back into the breach in the true sense of the word. This brief foray into the catacombs of the Sir Harry Gibbs building was partly altruistic (as I find ICL briefs intrinsically rewarding), partly “product placement” (that sounds tacky) and partly to keep my forensic skills honed.
Family law financial arbitrations are gathering momentum in Queensland. Whilst relatively simple, there are some subtle nuances to be aware of when designing your arbitration process.
In Australia, certain transfers of property between parties to a marital or de facto (domestic) relationship are subject to various revenue laws.
The first mediation back for 2017 had me confused. It was booked in the usual way, however one party was a son acting under enduring power of attorney for his father. The other party was the de facto partner (of the father).
The appeal concerned the decision of Foster J to set aside a BFA and thereafter order interim spousal maintenance in the sum of $1,500 per week to the wife. The thrust of the appeal was the trial judge’s decision to set aside the BFA pursuant to s90K(1)(d) namely that there had been a material change in circumstances due to the birth of children after the execution of the agreement. It is to be noted that the wife was pregnant with the parties first child when signing the BFA.
The hard work has been done and you have received your award from the arbitrator. Or, a new client attends your office with an award from an arbitrator. What steps you take next for the client, depends upon whether the client accepts and wishes to enforce the award or does not accept.
On Saturday 19 November, I was privileged to be a presenter at FLPA in the Tropics, Townsville with several other colleagues and respected judges. This was a repeat of the FLPA presentation in Cairns earlier in the year.
As well as offering mediation services to assist resolve disputes, often overlooked is our ability, as Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners, to assist parties on an interim basis.
At the National Family Law Conference on 19 October 2016 the Attorney-General released the Reports on Families with Complex Needs and the Intersection of the Family Law and Child Protection Systems (Terms of Reference 3,4 and 5).
Per the Chief Judge: “The Court’s workload has steadily increased and the timely replacement of retiring judges is critical to the Court’s ability to deal with its workload. Additional judges are also needed to cope with increased jurisdiction, greater volume, and increasing length of trials.”
On 18 August 2016 the Attorney-General released a new online resource for judicial officers dealing with domestic and family violence cases.
Here is some good news from Canberra with the Attorney-General releasing details upon important initiatives for the family law system. Each family that is kept out of the family law system benefits all of those involved in the system.
What follows may not win me many friends however I hope it stimulates debate and action.
The typical family run business dynamic often presents challenges within the context of a mediation.
One common question that arises during our seminars is, “Can the award be appealed?”. The first concept to understand is that there is no provision for an “appeal” of an award but rather a review of the award (sec. 13J) or by setting aside the award (sec. 13K)